CI3- Malalignment of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint in Hallux Valgus. Its Anatomical Cause and Diagnostic Problem
 
Y TANAKA (Nara - Japan)
Progression of hallux valgus deformity causes subluxation of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint
Congruity of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is an important factor for decision making of bunior
surgery. Two studies which were described below would be presented in this lecture. First, concerning the anatornical cause of the malalignmertt, it is not knnown whether lateral deviation of the first proximal phalange or rnedial deviation of the first metatarsal head causes the sùbluxation. To answer this question, a two dimensional coordinate system was devised for evaluation of a weight-bearing dorsoplantar radiograph (Study 1). Next, recently, a distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) gets into the news im the foot and ankle field. Identification of a lateral edlge of distal joint surface on the first metatarsal head is essential for evaluation of the congruity, however that is sometimes difficult in plane radiographs. Tble findings of the congruity in the plain radiographs were verifiedl by those in 3D-CT (Study 2).
 
Precise Anatomic Configuration Changes in the First Ray of the Hallux Valgus Foot (Study 1)
 
Two hundred and twenty-nine feet of 144 female patients (10-76 years, mean 42 years) with symptomatic hallux valgus and 94 feet of 64 normal female subjects (16-77 years, mean 41 years) were studied for precise anatomical configration changes in the first ray. Each accurate weightbearing radiograph was evaluated by two dimensional coordinate system; the axis of the shaft of the second metatarsal is the x axis, the intersection of the x axis with the proximal end of the second metatarsal is the point of origin, and perpendicular to the x axis that passes through the point of origin is the y axis. Using a digitizer, x, coordinates were measured at 4 points: the tip of the distal phalanx (DD1), the midpoint of the proximal joint surface of the proximal phalanx (PP1), and points of intersection between the axis of the first metatarsal and the distal and proximal ends of the metatarsal (MH1, MB 1). The values were expressed as
percentage of the length of the second metatarsal. Sixty-four percent of the feet in the hallux valgus group and 4 % in the normal group had subluxation of the first MTP joints. The mean values of the hallux valgus angle in the hallux valgus group and the normal group were 29.4fl and 9.7fl, and those of the distal metatarsal articular angle were 8.0fl and 2.3fl. The mean values of the y coordinates of DD1, PP1, MH1, and MB 1 in the hallux valgus were 14.9, 36.1, 45.9, and 23.7% and those in the normal group 27.6, 35.4, 38.8, and 23.9%, respectively. Those of the y coordinates of DD1 and MH1 were significantly different between the two groups (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean x values of any 4 points and the
values of PPI and MB 1. The present study showed that the first metatarsal head of the hallux valgus foot was located on the medial side of that of the normal foot and the base of the proximal phalange of the hallux valgus foot was located on the same point of that of the normal foot. This means that subluxation of the MTP joint in hallux valgus is caused by metatarsus primus varus. As a principle of bunion surgery this study indicated that first metatarsal osteotomies are theoretically correct methods.
 
 
Inspection of the Congruity of the First MTP Joint in Hallux Valgus using 3D-CT Images (Study 2)
Thirty feet in seventeen female patients with hallux valgus were studied. The lateral edges of the distal joint surface on the first metatarsal head in the plane radiographs were identified by a bony protrusion, a dimple and a trabecular shadow. Congruence was defined as a proximal joint surface of the proximal phalanx completely adapted to the metatarsal head, and incongruence was defined as only a small part of proximal joint surface was subluxated Six feet were in congruence, 21 feet in incongruence, and 3 feet in reservation of judgement in plane radiographs, and 5 feet, 25 feet, and O foot in 3D-CT, respectively. One foot that was judged as congruence using the index of the dimple had been misread. Three feet in which judgement was reserved were subluxated in 3D-CT. The bony protrusion and the tubercular shadow always represented the lateral edges, but the dimple did not indicate the lateral edge. I concluded that the accurate indices of the lateral edge of distal joint surface were the bony protrusion and the tubercular shadow.